Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in Sterling County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 40
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in Sterling County, Texas totaled $341,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | John Barton Davis | , 00000 | $2,873 |
| 22 | John C Dorn | Tulia, TX 79088 | $2,688 |
| 23 | Philip Glass | Water Valley, TX 76958 | $2,611 |
| 24 | Lee Caldwell | Abilene, TX 79605 | $2,500 |
| 25 | Craig Frizzell | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $2,160 |
| 26 | Stroman Ranch L C | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $1,836 |
| 27 | Michael Scot Long | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $1,651 |
| 28 | Cinco Cattle Co | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $1,500 |
| 29 | Lonnie C Horwood | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $1,458 |
| 30 | Richard Dean Long | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $1,366 |
| 31 | Royal T Foster Jr | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $1,359 |
| 32 | Phil Cole | San Angelo, TX 76903 | $1,053 |
| 33 | Sidney J Long | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $774 |
| 34 | Bill C Humble | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $705 |
| 35 | Wesley Glass | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $684 |
| 36 | Baylor Walker | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $684 |
| 37 | Andy Smith | San Angelo, TX 76906 | $507 |
| 38 | Mcclure & Son | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $500 |
| 39 | Ron Eaton | Wolfforth, TX 79382 | $402 |
| 40 | Blessin Frizzell | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf