Farm Subsidy information
Sterling County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Sterling County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 232
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sterling County, Texas totaled $25,337,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Leon Ferguson | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $98,275 |
42 | Courtney King | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $97,405 |
43 | Richard Yarbar | Big Spring, TX 79721 | $97,363 |
44 | Michael C Bodine | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $97,275 |
45 | Sterling County Ranch Management | Granbury, TX 76048 | $92,261 |
46 | Bill B Allen | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $91,154 |
47 | Alan Curry | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $88,715 |
48 | Valley Sheep Inc | San Angelo, TX 76903 | $87,189 |
49 | June & Wayland Foster Ranch Partn | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $86,459 |
50 | Wm Foster Ranches LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $86,148 |
51 | Tory Morrison | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $84,144 |
52 | Sunrise Farms | Winters, TX 79567 | $81,791 |
53 | W & W Foster | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $81,740 |
54 | Cinco Cattle Co | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $76,775 |
55 | Sterling Lamb LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $76,474 |
56 | Harvey Dan Glass | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $69,723 |
57 | Steve Monreal | Austin, TX 78736 | $67,639 |
58 | Wanda Foster | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $63,647 |
59 | Temple Ann Driver | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $62,879 |
60 | Michael Jaramillo | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $60,228 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”