Farm Subsidy information
Stonewall County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Stonewall County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 246
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stonewall County, Texas totaled $6,691,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bailey T Myers | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $30,831 |
22 | Vineyards At Double Mountain LLC | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $29,462 |
23 | Nita Isbell | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $25,857 |
24 | , | $25,856 | |
25 | Wayland Foster Ranch LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $25,650 |
26 | Mary Lois & Bill Wilson Family Ltd | Snyder, TX 79550 | $25,368 |
27 | Claybourne F Clarke | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $24,854 |
28 | Bobby Wedeking | Stamford, TX 79553 | $24,600 |
29 | 2012 Roy Douglas Russell Irrevocable Trust Agreeme | Breckenridge, TX 76424 | $24,216 |
30 | John Michael Mcgough | Pasadena, TX 77504 | $24,192 |
31 | Lyndell Dickerson | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $22,594 |
32 | Pumphrey Family Trust | Fort Worth, TX 76116 | $22,277 |
33 | Richard A Hawkins | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $22,090 |
34 | Cody Myers | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $21,679 |
35 | Wj Flowers LLC | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $20,427 |
36 | William Brad Long | Rotan, TX 79546 | $18,695 |
37 | Wm Foster Ranches LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $18,625 |
38 | Yvonne Kiker Williams | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $18,126 |
39 | Cole Farms | Hamlin, TX 79520 | $17,051 |
40 | Brent Meador | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $16,432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”