Farm Subsidy information
Stonewall County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Stonewall County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,495
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stonewall County, Texas totaled $114,078,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mary Lois & Bill Wilson Family Ltd | Snyder, TX 79550 | $587,279 |
22 | Branch Land & Cattle Company LLC | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $546,507 |
23 | Wendell A Morgan | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $539,287 |
24 | Daniel Ranch Ltd | Guthrie, TX 79236 | $537,498 |
25 | Kraig Kupatt | Rule, TX 79548 | $522,578 |
26 | James C Hecht | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $499,892 |
27 | Jay Curry Beakley | Old Glory, TX 79540 | $498,116 |
28 | Joe R Douglass | Victoria, TX 77905 | $489,317 |
29 | Baugh Family Ranches Limited Partnership | Rotan, TX 79546 | $482,225 |
30 | Jeff Sedberry | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $481,302 |
31 | Justin G Myers | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $478,275 |
32 | Bar 9 Farms Inc | Hamlin, TX 79520 | $472,568 |
33 | Lavon Beakley | Rule, TX 79547 | $469,115 |
34 | Yvonne Kiker Williams | Rule, TX 79547 | $464,947 |
35 | Riddel Land & Cattle L P | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $462,388 |
36 | Caloosa Ranch LLC | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $455,665 |
37 | Flyn Simmons | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $447,823 |
38 | Claybourne F Clarke | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $412,421 |
39 | Mildred M Allen | Old Glory, TX 79540 | $410,468 |
40 | Bar S Ranch Partnership | Aspermont, TX 79502 | $396,052 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”