Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Titus County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 267
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Titus County, Texas totaled $1,195,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Don L Alexander | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $6,545 |
42 | Bobby D Burns | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $6,435 |
43 | Trenton Cole Shumate | Cookville, TX 75558 | $6,215 |
44 | Irma Robles | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $6,199 |
45 | C & M Livestock LLC | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $6,050 |
46 | Travis Priefert | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $6,050 |
47 | Kurtis Mathias | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,995 |
48 | Brian A Hunnicutt | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,940 |
49 | Joshua K Hatfield | Omaha, TX 75571 | $5,882 |
50 | Roberto Marroquin | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,503 |
51 | Ricky Tigert | Daingerfield, TX 75638 | $5,500 |
52 | Tony Anschutz | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,445 |
53 | Tim Newman | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,445 |
54 | Argo 2011 Trust | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,390 |
55 | Staci Hinton | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,390 |
56 | Bobby Ziedy Jr | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,349 |
57 | Tiffany Mabe | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $5,280 |
58 | Ricky Rosewell | Cookville, TX 75558 | $4,785 |
59 | William Rex Marrs | Mount Vernon, TX 75457 | $4,744 |
60 | Anita Elizabeth Posey | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $4,675 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”