Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Titus County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 219
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Titus County, Texas totaled $427,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Garry Chad Taylor | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,244 |
42 | Richard Allen Hughes | Mount Vernon, TX 75457 | $2,143 |
43 | Jon Christopher Horn | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,123 |
44 | Kurtis Mathias | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,115 |
45 | , | $2,082 | |
46 | Gregory L Spigener | Omaha, TX 75571 | $2,008 |
47 | Ricky Rosewell | Cookville, TX 75558 | $1,985 |
48 | Laci Lanae Carlisle-derrick | Cookville, TX 75558 | $1,900 |
49 | Brian A Hunnicutt | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,846 |
50 | Alfred Byron Thomas | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,826 |
51 | Anita Demby Mcrae | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,805 |
52 | Jimmy Hughes | Mount Vernon, TX 75457 | $1,628 |
53 | Tommy Stansell | Mount Pleasant, TX 75456 | $1,619 |
54 | Jeffery William Swafford | Omaha, TX 75571 | $1,600 |
55 | Richard Holland | Cookville, TX 75558 | $1,531 |
56 | Bonne Mellema | Mount Vernon, TX 75457 | $1,524 |
57 | Roberto Marroquin | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,505 |
58 | Kristy K Cameron | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,499 |
59 | Michael W Logan | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,397 |
60 | Tim Newman | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,386 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”