Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Titus County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 224
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Titus County, Texas totaled $685,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Anita Elizabeth Posey | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,660 |
82 | Lisa Reni Martin | Cookville, TX 75558 | $1,656 |
83 | Howard Cameron | Mount Pleasant, TX 75456 | $1,623 |
84 | Daniel Craig Easley | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,593 |
85 | Christopher D Basham | Mount Pleasant, TX 75456 | $1,580 |
86 | Bryan Justin Ray Edwards | Cookville, TX 75558 | $1,558 |
87 | Roberto Marroquin | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,505 |
88 | Larry Phillips | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,470 |
89 | Jerry Ray Rosewell | Cookville, TX 75558 | $1,454 |
90 | Joseph Ben Cameron | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,453 |
91 | Gerald E Hampton | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,407 |
92 | Paul R Lindsey | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,405 |
93 | Michael W Logan | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,397 |
94 | K Michael Fields | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,354 |
95 | Duc Anh LLC | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,341 |
96 | Pen-paz Holdings, LLC | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,341 |
97 | Dustin Ayers | Daingerfield, TX 75638 | $1,339 |
98 | Dennis T Newman | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $1,331 |
99 | , | $1,316 | |
100 | Bill Hunnicutt | Winfield, TX 75493 | $1,307 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”