Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Titus County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 360
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Titus County, Texas totaled $1,568,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Curtis Cameron | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,922 |
142 | Connie Lynn Lunsford | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,920 |
143 | Robert W Giddens | Talco, TX 75487 | $2,882 |
144 | Edward Florey | Mount Pleasant, TX 75456 | $2,859 |
145 | Walter N Rieger | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,838 |
146 | James R Mcelroy | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,749 |
147 | Jerry D Russell | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,697 |
148 | Danny Cook | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,677 |
149 | Paul Cameron | Cookville, TX 75558 | $2,583 |
150 | Jason B Hughes | Mount Vernon, TX 75457 | $2,558 |
151 | Johnny Stansell | Talco, TX 75487 | $2,506 |
152 | Jerry Beason | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,505 |
153 | John Roy Wilson | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,502 |
154 | D Ray Martin | Pittsburg, TX 75686 | $2,502 |
155 | Brett Thomas | Mount Pleasant, TX 75456 | $2,502 |
156 | Darrell Robertson | Cookville, TX 75558 | $2,489 |
157 | Donald Hugh Williams | Omaha, TX 75571 | $2,448 |
158 | John Difrancesco | Mount Pleasant, TX 75456 | $2,434 |
159 | Howard Cargile | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,426 |
160 | Harold A Cameron | Cookville, TX 75558 | $2,299 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”