Counter Cyclical Program in Tom Green County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 921
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Tom Green County, Texas totaled $29,880,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brent Niehues Farms Inc | Wall, TX 76957 | $254,992 |
22 | Gene Gully & Sons Farms | Mereta, TX 76940 | $254,784 |
23 | Parmer Farms | Veribest, TX 76886 | $253,471 |
24 | Darwin S Dusek | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $242,203 |
25 | Kevin Niehues Farms Inc | Eola, TX 76937 | $236,792 |
26 | G & C Farms | Veribest, TX 76886 | $234,474 |
27 | Gary L Halfmann | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $231,098 |
28 | Glen Kellermeier | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $219,833 |
29 | Marcus Gerngross | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $218,523 |
30 | Ralph Kellermeier | Miles, TX 76861 | $217,997 |
31 | Arlin Woehl | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $215,269 |
32 | Frank Gerngross Jr | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $215,239 |
33 | Brian Dierschke | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $208,713 |
34 | D & B Farms | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $198,675 |
35 | Kenneth A Powell | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $197,691 |
36 | M & M Farms | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $197,238 |
37 | Darryl Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $192,532 |
38 | Nolan B Niehues | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $191,995 |
39 | Kevin Sturm | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $189,047 |
40 | Erwin Schwartz Jr | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $185,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”