Production Flexibility Program in Tom Green County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 970
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Tom Green County, Texas totaled $21,879,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kevin Niehues | Eola, TX 76937 | $117,975 |
42 | Darwin S Dusek | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $117,860 |
43 | Presley A Weishuhn | Eola, TX 76937 | $114,898 |
44 | Brian Dierschke | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $110,382 |
45 | Larry Powell | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $109,960 |
46 | Milton Plagens Jr | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $109,501 |
47 | Myrl Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $109,426 |
48 | Larry Wilde | Mereta, TX 76940 | $107,359 |
49 | David Kubenka | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $106,745 |
50 | Kenneth A Powell | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $105,505 |
51 | Stanley Holik Jr | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $105,420 |
52 | Bernard Fuchs | Eola, TX 76937 | $104,430 |
53 | Ricky D Werner | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $104,037 |
54 | Stuart Gully | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $102,262 |
55 | Olen Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $101,515 |
56 | Laverne Hoelscher | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $100,156 |
57 | Kenneth Wm Dierschke | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $100,132 |
58 | Lee Ray Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $99,860 |
59 | David Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $98,953 |
60 | Clayton Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $97,530 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”