Farm Subsidy information
Tom Green County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Tom Green County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 722
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tom Green County, Texas totaled $27,180,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Darryl Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $66,317 |
62 | Curtis A Schwartz | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $65,690 |
63 | Kevin Niehues Farms Inc | Eola, TX 76937 | $65,634 |
64 | Kenneth Gully | Eola, TX 76937 | $65,242 |
65 | Barbara Block | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $65,188 |
66 | Wilbert L Jost | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $62,863 |
67 | Bruce Gully | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $62,197 |
68 | Ben & Betsy Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $62,002 |
69 | Lone Wolf Operations Unlimited LLC | Water Valley, TX 76958 | $61,622 |
70 | Whitehead Properties Inc | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $61,339 |
71 | Brent Niehues Farms Inc | Wall, TX 76957 | $61,310 |
72 | Concho Valley Farms Inc | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $60,533 |
73 | Marcus Gerngross | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $60,328 |
74 | Clayton Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $59,627 |
75 | Grant Matschek Farms Inc | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $58,014 |
76 | John E Schwartz Sr | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $57,608 |
77 | Greg Matschek Farms Inc | Eola, TX 76937 | $57,568 |
78 | Cole R Mikulik | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $57,223 |
79 | Todd Schwertner | Miles, TX 76861 | $56,622 |
80 | Jason W Holik | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $56,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”