Production Flexibility Program in Tom Green County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 970
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Tom Green County, Texas totaled $21,879,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gary Holik | Wall, TX 76957 | $65,980 |
102 | Steve Matthiesen | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $65,963 |
103 | Roy Martin | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $64,942 |
104 | Harvey J Mikulik | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $64,652 |
105 | Erwin F Schwartz Sr | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $64,461 |
106 | Michael Mikulik | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $63,840 |
107 | Frank Holik III | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $63,151 |
108 | Charles & Roger Glass Farms | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $62,746 |
109 | Marvin Dierschke | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $62,687 |
110 | Barry Brodnax | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $62,584 |
111 | John W Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $62,236 |
112 | Benny J Holik | Wall, TX 76957 | $60,602 |
113 | John Holik | Wall, TX 76957 | $60,602 |
114 | Eddie F Holik Jr | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $60,599 |
115 | Adolph C Holik | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $60,594 |
116 | Wilfred H Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $60,553 |
117 | Ralph E Hoelscher | Miles, TX 76861 | $58,770 |
118 | Michael P Sturm | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $57,167 |
119 | M G Farms | Mereta, TX 76940 | $56,894 |
120 | Rustic Acres Inc | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $56,365 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”