Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Victoria County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 536
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Victoria County, Texas totaled $18,700,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Howard Book | Victoria, TX 77905 | $221,975 |
22 | Stephen Diebel | Victoria, TX 77904 | $204,993 |
23 | Obsta Farms Jv | Victoria, TX 77905 | $197,099 |
24 | Thom Joshua Enterprise LLC | Victoria, TX 77905 | $168,044 |
25 | Vic Salinas | Victoria, TX 77905 | $167,992 |
26 | Monroe Joshua | Victoria, TX 77905 | $167,992 |
27 | Roy Jurica | Victoria, TX 77905 | $156,560 |
28 | Brian Gene Adamek | Victoria, TX 77905 | $154,093 |
29 | New First National Bank ** | Victoria, TX 77904 | $151,847 |
30 | Brandl Farms Jv | Victoria, TX 77905 | $146,228 |
31 | Frank Maraggia | Inez, TX 77968 | $143,026 |
32 | John W Smajstrla | Victoria, TX 77903 | $130,817 |
33 | David Huber | Victoria, TX 77905 | $123,312 |
34 | Dustin Brandl | Victoria, TX 77905 | $116,207 |
35 | Mayfield Ranch Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $111,076 |
36 | Clay Monroe Ohrt | Victoria, TX 77905 | $110,145 |
37 | J & R Leita Farm & Ranch | Inez, TX 77968 | $106,931 |
38 | John Michael Leita | Inez, TX 77968 | $106,011 |
39 | Eileen L May Trust | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $102,338 |
40 | Anthony Maraggia | Inez, TX 77968 | $100,831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”