Farm Subsidy information
Victoria County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Victoria County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,167
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Victoria County, Texas totaled $203,222,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Franz Ag Interests | Inez, TX 77968 | $7,397,694 |
2 | J & S Hroch Jv | Victoria, TX 77905 | $4,725,535 |
3 | J & P Leita Farms Jv | Victoria, TX 77905 | $2,863,204 |
4 | Salley Farms Jv | Port O Connor, TX 77982 | $2,818,402 |
5 | Salem Operating Jv | Victoria, TX 77904 | $2,765,587 |
6 | R R & C Enterprises | Victoria, TX 77902 | $2,563,546 |
7 | J & R Leita Farm & Ranch | Inez, TX 77968 | $2,525,647 |
8 | Kenneth & Louise Johnson Farms Jv | Victoria, TX 77905 | $2,393,573 |
9 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $2,173,184 |
10 | Donnie Hempel | Victoria, TX 77905 | $2,153,664 |
11 | Billy F Buzek Farms Jv | Inez, TX 77968 | $2,143,878 |
12 | Darwin Wade Hamilton | Victoria, TX 77905 | $2,138,818 |
13 | Brandl Farms Jv | Victoria, TX 77905 | $2,130,570 |
14 | Donald Meek & Sons | Inez, TX 77968 | $2,024,756 |
15 | Delvin Hroch | Victoria, TX 77905 | $1,998,138 |
16 | Barbara Diebel Cattle Co | Victoria, TX 77904 | $1,976,971 |
17 | Meek Brothers | Inez, TX 77968 | $1,847,873 |
18 | Rice Creek Farms Jv | Victoria, TX 77902 | $1,838,083 |
19 | Cdt Cattle Co | Victoria, TX 77901 | $1,823,728 |
20 | Roy Jurica | Victoria, TX 77905 | $1,761,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>