Farm Subsidy information
Wharton County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Wharton County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,055
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wharton County, Texas totaled $29,609,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dorotik Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $101,911 |
22 | Reveille Farms | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $100,928 |
23 | Philip Wade Hall | El Campo, TX 77437 | $97,082 |
24 | Pierce Ranch | Pierce, TX 77467 | $96,563 |
25 | Sam Farms | Louise, TX 77455 | $94,680 |
26 | Priesmeyer Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $91,953 |
27 | Gadeke Bros | El Campo, TX 77437 | $90,197 |
28 | Lr Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $88,978 |
29 | J Forgason Division Ltd | Hungerford, TX 77448 | $85,239 |
30 | Ranchers Investments Inc | Graham, TX 76450 | $83,927 |
31 | Jdk Farms | Lissie, TX 77454 | $82,493 |
32 | Jlg Farms Jv | El Campo, TX 77437 | $80,151 |
33 | Watz Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $79,647 |
34 | R L Kohleffel Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $78,975 |
35 | Rice Creek Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $78,868 |
36 | H & K Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $78,556 |
37 | Popp Farms 05 | El Campo, TX 77437 | $76,835 |
38 | Sylvester & Joan Cerny Joint Venture | El Campo, TX 77437 | $73,336 |
39 | Ggs Farms | Victoria, TX 77904 | $71,378 |
40 | Bcf Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $70,137 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”