Market Gains in Wharton County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 886
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Wharton County, Texas totaled $18,471,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Warren Morton | Louise, TX 77455 | $137,598 |
22 | Real Mccoy Farms | Wharton, TX 77488 | $136,773 |
23 | Wolf Run Farms Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $134,357 |
24 | Lonnie R Neel | El Campo, TX 77437 | $131,383 |
25 | Cerny Brothers Farm | Louise, TX 77455 | $130,465 |
26 | Blake A Lauritsen | El Campo, TX 77437 | $120,598 |
27 | M N Ranch | Egypt, TX 77436 | $117,219 |
28 | Eric Schoenfield | El Campo, TX 77437 | $115,409 |
29 | Countyline Farms J V | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $115,235 |
30 | Hlavinka Land Company Lp | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $115,081 |
31 | Lonnie Neel Farms Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $114,518 |
32 | Mark English Jv | El Campo, TX 77437 | $111,680 |
33 | Arthur A Priesmeyer & Sons | El Campo, TX 77437 | $111,619 |
34 | Gary & Jeanette Schoenfield Ptr | El Campo, TX 77437 | $109,796 |
35 | Rojo Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $109,497 |
36 | B & D Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $108,898 |
37 | Joe M Crane | Bay City, TX 77404 | $106,190 |
38 | S & S Farms | Bay City, TX 77404 | $104,886 |
39 | Popp Farms 05 | El Campo, TX 77437 | $104,843 |
40 | 77 Farms Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $104,337 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”