Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Wharton County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,899
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Wharton County, Texas totaled $144,385,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | M & W Farm & Ranch Partnership | Egypt, TX 77436 | $634,421 |
42 | Priesmeyer Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $624,546 |
43 | Ggs Farms | Victoria, TX 77904 | $611,169 |
44 | S & S Farms | Bay City, TX 77404 | $597,713 |
45 | Mongo Farms Partnership | El Campo, TX 77437 | $590,617 |
46 | Ralac Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $566,062 |
47 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $565,606 |
48 | Gadeke Bros | El Campo, TX 77437 | $565,135 |
49 | Tomcat Joint Venture | Louise, TX 77455 | $560,343 |
50 | Hrm General Partnership | Hungerford, TX 77448 | $542,294 |
51 | Thomas A Smaistrla Jv | Sealy, TX 77474 | $538,293 |
52 | Horizon Farms Jv | Wharton, TX 77488 | $524,141 |
53 | Commercial State Bank ** | Ferris, TX 75125 | $508,492 |
54 | Double Creek Farms | Louise, TX 77455 | $504,761 |
55 | I V Duncan Ranch Lp-llp | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $487,108 |
56 | Slade Harfst Farm Partnership | El Campo, TX 77437 | $485,645 |
57 | W5 Sisters Properties Ltd. | Houston, TX 77079 | $480,163 |
58 | J & N Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $475,664 |
59 | Goudeau Farms LLC | Hungerford, TX 77448 | $468,213 |
60 | Stacey Wayne Dennis | Louise, TX 77455 | $463,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”