Total Commodity Programs in Wharton County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,998
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wharton County, Texas totaled $739,597,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cerny Brothers Farm | Louise, TX 77455 | $2,379,882 |
42 | S & S Farms J V | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $2,358,456 |
43 | Boettcher & Quirey | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $2,264,800 |
44 | Wigginton Family Jv | El Campo, TX 77437 | $2,211,548 |
45 | Dixie Farms Joint Venture | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $2,177,039 |
46 | Russell R Rabius | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $2,152,845 |
47 | Triple H Farms | Wharton, TX 77488 | $2,127,520 |
48 | Watz Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $2,125,769 |
49 | Tomcat Joint Venture | Louise, TX 77455 | $2,058,154 |
50 | Blue Creek Rice Farms Inc | Danevang, TX 77432 | $2,056,334 |
51 | Popp Farms 05 | El Campo, TX 77437 | $2,039,074 |
52 | S & S Farms | Bay City, TX 77404 | $2,038,171 |
53 | Alphonse V Cerny Jr | El Campo, TX 77437 | $1,994,502 |
54 | Steven Goetsch Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $1,964,885 |
55 | Kramr Brothers | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $1,962,323 |
56 | I V Duncan Ranch Lp-llp | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $1,950,239 |
57 | Lps Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $1,925,039 |
58 | Multi Grain Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $1,911,255 |
59 | Wicke Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $1,895,288 |
60 | Jo Marie Rabius | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $1,887,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”