Conservation Reserve Program in Yoakum County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 286
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Yoakum County, Texas totaled $2,230,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Laurel L Matus | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $10,544 |
62 | Sue Hoskins | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $10,370 |
63 | Charline L Crump Rvoc Tr | Plains, TX 79355 | $10,332 |
64 | Alice E Winkles Partnership | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $10,201 |
65 | Sophie Edwards | Odessa, TX 79761 | $10,131 |
66 | Thomas L Durham | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $9,772 |
67 | Larry P Bade And Karen S Bade Revocable Living Tr | Jonesburg, MO 63351 | $9,336 |
68 | Gary R Adcock | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $9,333 |
69 | Cornelius Letkeman Redecop | Seminole, TX 79360 | $9,175 |
70 | Peter K Banman | Denver City, TX 79323 | $9,135 |
71 | Katharina F Banman | Denver City, TX 79323 | $9,135 |
72 | 4c Horizons LLC | Plains, TX 79355 | $9,122 |
73 | Brenda Canada | Plains, TX 79355 | $8,983 |
74 | Norma Billings | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $8,975 |
75 | Walter Billings | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $8,975 |
76 | Harbin Properties II | Ooltewah, TN 37363 | $8,754 |
77 | K & S Farms Inc | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $8,556 |
78 | , | $8,537 | |
79 | Evertt Harrel | Denver City, TX 79323 | $8,255 |
80 | Ross Harrel | Denver City, TX 79323 | $8,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”