Farm Subsidy information
Zapata County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Zapata County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 121
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Zapata County, Texas totaled $1,735,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Andres Guerra | Zapata, TX 78076 | $6,062 |
42 | Jorge Luis Zapata | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $5,458 |
43 | Fidencio Mendoza Jr | Zapata, TX 78076 | $5,280 |
44 | Fernando Munoz Jr | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $5,227 |
45 | Jaime A Martinez | Zapata, TX 78076 | $5,020 |
46 | Tomas Ramirez Jr | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $4,801 |
47 | J Flores & Sons Cattle Co Ltd | Zapata, TX 78076 | $4,651 |
48 | Jose H Lopez | Laredo, TX 78043 | $3,709 |
49 | David Wayne Garza | San Antonio, TX 78254 | $3,548 |
50 | Hector M Vela | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,509 |
51 | Fidel Lopez Florez | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $3,346 |
52 | Juan Garza | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,334 |
53 | Flavio Sergio Gonzalez | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,310 |
54 | Adolfo Pena Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,253 |
55 | Jaime Gutierrez | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,202 |
56 | Juan M Vela | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,161 |
57 | Antonio A Mendoza | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,108 |
58 | Nicolas Gutierrez | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,107 |
59 | Felipe Gonzalez Jr | Zapata, TX 78076 | $3,067 |
60 | Epr Holdings Ltd | Houston, TX 77005 | $3,015 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”