Farm Subsidy information
Zapata County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Zapata County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 426
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Zapata County, Texas totaled $14,413,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rathmell Land & Cattle Co Ltd | Zapata, TX 78076 | $702,451 |
2 | Delfino Lozano Iv | Zapata, TX 78076 | $354,054 |
3 | Juan A Medina | Zapata, TX 78076 | $268,192 |
4 | Elvira V Padilla Dba Padilla Catt | Zapata, TX 78076 | $240,256 |
5 | Jose M Ramirez Jr | San Ygnacio, TX 78067 | $191,642 |
6 | Oscar X Gonzalez | Zapata, TX 78076 | $172,172 |
7 | L - L Cattle Co Ltd | Laredo, TX 78045 | $152,445 |
8 | Norberto Lopez | Zapata, TX 78076 | $149,583 |
9 | Stone Brothers | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $137,884 |
10 | Ignac R Faltysek | Rosenberg, TX 77471 | $128,912 |
11 | Hector M Vela | Zapata, TX 78076 | $128,899 |
12 | Don Jose Land And Cattle Co., Ltd.,llp | Zapata, TX 78076 | $121,237 |
13 | Tom M Harper | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $116,841 |
14 | Three S Cattle Co | Laredo, TX 78041 | $116,573 |
15 | Leonel Gonzalez | Zapata, TX 78076 | $114,170 |
16 | Celso Uribe | Laredo, TX 78041 | $113,020 |
17 | Javier Munoz | Zapata, TX 78076 | $106,494 |
18 | Manuel Maria Zepeda | San Ygnacio, TX 78067 | $105,582 |
19 | Elvira V Padilla | Zapata, TX 78076 | $101,699 |
20 | B & J Onion & Melon Co | San Ygnacio, TX 78067 | $100,024 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>