Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,184
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Utah totaled $49,210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Nick J Sampinos | Price, UT 84501 | $130,238 |
62 | Sacco Brothers Land & Livestock LLC | Helper, UT 84526 | $129,291 |
63 | W F Goring & Son Inc | Deweyville, UT 84309 | $128,125 |
64 | T-n Ranching Company LLC | Price, UT 84501 | $127,170 |
65 | Stanton J Gleave | Kingston, UT 84743 | $126,929 |
66 | Dennis J Richins | Henefer, UT 84033 | $126,782 |
67 | Stephen A Osguthorpe | Park City, UT 84060 | $123,217 |
68 | Nps Holdings | Wellington, UT 84542 | $121,651 |
69 | Harold Selman Inc | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $119,509 |
70 | Pearsons Ranch | Minersville, UT 84752 | $119,095 |
71 | Spencer Brothers LLC | Malta, ID 83342 | $118,757 |
72 | Clark And Shirley Bradshaw Family Lmtd Ptnr | Beaver, UT 84713 | $116,719 |
73 | Rudger C Atkin Inc | Saint George, UT 84790 | $116,670 |
74 | Kory Stephensen | Fountain Green, UT 84632 | $116,259 |
75 | Heaton Cattle Company LLC | Saint George, UT 84791 | $115,174 |
76 | Rainbow Glass Ranch LLC | Orangeville, UT 84537 | $114,009 |
77 | Kunzler Ranch LLC | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $113,936 |
78 | , | $113,122 | |
79 | Clark Brothers | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $111,272 |
80 | M R Wilde And Sons | Croydon, UT 84018 | $109,639 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”