Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Utah, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 4,190

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Utah totaled $82,109,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
101Blake PetersonMonticello, UT 84535$131,679
102Meikle Brothers IncSmithfield, UT 84335$130,885
103S Miller Livestock LLCManti, UT 84642$130,568
104T&l Livestock IncRoosevelt, UT 84066$130,515
105Bar Backward C Group LLCSalina, UT 84654$128,802
106Wade Keven JensenCleveland, UT 84518$127,513
107Chew Livestock IncJensen, UT 84035$127,458
108Clark Family Dairy IncMorgan, UT 84050$123,551
109Peart Ranch Operations LLCRandolph, UT 84064$122,190
110S David EarlCollinston, UT 84306$122,021
111Benjamin Steven HoganLayton, UT 84041$121,920
112M Dunford Weston Family PartnershipLogan, UT 84321$121,906
113Stephen A OsguthorpePark City, UT 84060$121,513
114Jw Cattle CompanyRandolph, UT 84064$120,059
115C & S Jones Livestock LcCedar City, UT 84720$119,727
116Chance Elmer AllredFountain Green, UT 84632$119,299
117Dan L Wright Lewiston PartnershipLewiston, UT 84320$119,135
118Olson's Garden Shoppe, IncPayson, UT 84651$118,522
119John D BownFayette, UT 84630$116,767
120Cv RanchesBancroft, ID 83217$116,753

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag