Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Utah, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,566

Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Utah totaled $41,232,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs
1995-2023
1E Ray Okelberry Joint VentureFountain Green, UT 84632$361,517
2Falslev Livestock IncSmithfield, UT 84335$347,166
3W F Goring & Son IncDeweyville, UT 84309$197,665
4Rose Land And CattlePark Valley, UT 84329$181,041
5Clark BrothersCedar City, UT 84721$160,883
6Holmgren Land & Livestock CompanyTremonton, UT 84337$151,388
7Frischknecht LivestockGunnison, UT 84634$142,129
8Thousand Peaks Ranches IncSalt Lake City, UT 84105$139,695
9Kunzler Ranch LLCPark Valley, UT 84329$134,128
10Ballard Hog Farm, IncSmithfield, UT 84335$133,812
11Warm Creek RanchBrigham City, UT 84302$128,315
12Chournos IncTremonton, UT 84337$128,246
13Connor Cattle Co %clair HolmgrenTremonton, UT 84337$126,153
14Spencer Land & LivestockMalta, ID 83342$126,001
15Kunzler Sheep & Cattle LLCPark Valley, UT 84329$124,880
16Arlin S HughesVeyo, UT 84782$124,431
17Frank D VincentLeamington, UT 84638$123,965
18Bedke's K-savy Ranch IncOakley, ID 83346$122,843
19Rafter S Ranch LLCKaysville, UT 84037$121,148
20Pearsons RanchMinersville, UT 84752$120,045

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag