Total Conservation Programs in Utah, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 437
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Utah totaled $3,903,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Triple P Brand LLC | Nephi, UT 84648 | $35,846 |
22 | Sunset Ranch LLC | Thatcher, UT 84337 | $35,522 |
23 | Ault Farms | American Fork, UT 84003 | $34,625 |
24 | Frank Rees Farms Limited | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $34,578 |
25 | Adams Land & Cattle LLC | Promontory, UT 84307 | $33,478 |
26 | John Edward Roring And Corinne Nielson Roring Fami | Orem, UT 84097 | $32,859 |
27 | Bar H Land LLC | Bear River City, UT 84301 | $32,499 |
28 | John H Skidmore | Cortez, CO 81321 | $32,469 |
29 | Bar H Ranch Inc | Bear River City, UT 84301 | $32,428 |
30 | J D Peterson Enterprises LLC | Snowville, UT 84336 | $31,908 |
31 | Sally K Larkin | Snowville, UT 84336 | $31,246 |
32 | Cedar Valley Farms LLC | Cedar Valley, UT 84013 | $31,066 |
33 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $30,656 |
34 | Eliason Cattle LLC | Snowville, UT 84336 | $30,072 |
35 | Suzanne A Halliday | Monticello, UT 84535 | $29,322 |
36 | Mountain Meadow Ranch Inc | Malta, ID 83342 | $28,905 |
37 | Kevin R Ramsay | Monticello, UT 84535 | $28,878 |
38 | Bar-m Cattle Company LLC | Ogden, UT 84404 | $28,554 |
39 | W C Hatch Ranch LLC | Scipio, UT 84656 | $28,090 |
40 | Sherie H Goring Dba Mountain Shadow Livestock Co | Deweyville, UT 84309 | $27,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”