Farm Subsidy information
Cache County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Cache County, Utah, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 532
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cache County, Utah totaled $17,925,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chris Karren Farms LLC | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $813,589 |
2 | Smith's Cream Pitcher Jerseys Inc | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $738,934 |
3 | Munk Family Farms, LLC | Amalga, UT 84335 | $721,981 |
4 | C And C Hoover Farms, LLC | Monticello, AR 71655 | $657,576 |
5 | Falslev Livestock Inc | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $548,819 |
6 | Ropies Dairy Inc | Hyrum, UT 84319 | $513,543 |
7 | Task-master Holsteins Inc | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $492,478 |
8 | Gibbons Farm Holdings LLC | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $460,677 |
9 | Andrew Dairy Inc | Trenton, UT 84338 | $434,869 |
10 | River View Dairy | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $415,881 |
11 | West Hills Dairy Farm Inc | Newton, UT 84327 | $379,622 |
12 | Meikle Brothers Inc | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $369,073 |
13 | Ballard Hog Farm, Inc | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $326,216 |
14 | Dan L Wright Lewiston Partnership | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $323,561 |
15 | W Lee Reese | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $293,656 |
16 | Bert D Reese & Sons Inc | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $280,207 |
17 | Lunday Dairy Inc | Cornish, UT 84308 | $249,519 |
18 | Griffin Farms Inc | Newton, UT 84327 | $214,002 |
19 | T & W Farms LLC | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $213,820 |
20 | D Kent Buttars | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $195,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>