Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Duchesne County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 201
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Duchesne County, Utah totaled $6,274,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joseph H Kemp & Son Inc | Mountain Home, UT 84051 | $47,735 |
42 | Bruce Dart | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $47,065 |
43 | Chona Dart | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $47,063 |
44 | Arva Potter | Duchesne, UT 84021 | $46,728 |
45 | Neil J Muir | Fruitland, UT 84027 | $46,409 |
46 | Diamond F Ranch LLC | Lehi, UT 84043 | $45,921 |
47 | Clyde Killian | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $44,720 |
48 | Todd A Killian | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $44,719 |
49 | Ellis Potter | Mt. Home, UT 84051 | $43,513 |
50 | Gary Lamar Nelson | Bluebell, UT 84007 | $43,164 |
51 | Howard R Horrocks Family Revocabl | Neola, UT 84053 | $43,045 |
52 | Mortensen Ranch | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $41,625 |
53 | Ross G Killian | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $41,374 |
54 | Kirk L Christensen | Talmage, UT 84073 | $40,530 |
55 | Lindsay Welding Service | Mountain Home, UT 84051 | $40,483 |
56 | Williams Family Trust | Boulder City, NV 89005 | $40,436 |
57 | Clair E Miles | Bluebell, UT 84007 | $40,428 |
58 | Nolan Larsen | Myton, UT 84052 | $39,293 |
59 | Mary J Coleman | Midway, UT 84049 | $39,203 |
60 | Max Roberts | Fruitland, UT 84027 | $39,140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”