Farm Subsidy information
Duchesne County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Duchesne County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,077
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Duchesne County, Utah totaled $41,194,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Four Taylors Livestock, LLC | Neola, UT 84053 | $269,699 |
22 | Gaylon Yack | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $257,965 |
23 | Aaron B Abbott | Duchesne, UT 84021 | $256,091 |
24 | Nolan Larsen | Myton, UT 84052 | $251,173 |
25 | Red Mesa Ranch LLC | Mountain Home, UT 84051 | $247,516 |
26 | Lane William Larsen | Myton, UT 84052 | $243,774 |
27 | Clinton Moon | Duchesne, UT 84021 | $237,711 |
28 | Bruce Dart | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $236,179 |
29 | Charles Hansen | Duchesne, UT 84021 | $228,584 |
30 | Thacker Riverside Dairy | Bluebell, UT 84007 | $228,071 |
31 | Killian's Cobble Rim Ranch LLC | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $219,266 |
32 | Todd Moon | Myton, UT 84052 | $218,501 |
33 | 3 String Cattle Co LLC | Heber City, UT 84032 | $215,669 |
34 | Mac Jessen | Altamont, UT 84001 | $215,447 |
35 | Robert Yack | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $213,456 |
36 | Shane Gardner | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $210,595 |
37 | Robert Hamblin | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $207,318 |
38 | Henderson Cattle Company LLC | Myton, UT 84052 | $205,554 |
39 | Lloyd Walker | Altonah, UT 84002 | $204,236 |
40 | Nelson Farms Inc | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $200,961 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”