Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Emery County, Utah, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 141
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Emery County, Utah totaled $465,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Singleton Cattle Company LLC | Ferron, UT 84523 | $3,105 |
42 | Rock Canyon Cattle Company LLC | Ferron, UT 84523 | $3,025 |
43 | John Cory Vetere | Green River, UT 84525 | $3,017 |
44 | Laurel Ann Nielsen | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $2,955 |
45 | Gregory W Vetere | Green River, UT 84525 | $2,878 |
46 | Ken Christiansen | Emery, UT 84522 | $2,546 |
47 | Lee V Moss | Orangeville, UT 84537 | $2,392 |
48 | Angie Y Peacock | Orangeville, UT 84537 | $2,365 |
49 | Dean L King | Green River, UT 84525 | $2,250 |
50 | Lonetree Family Ranch LLC | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $2,162 |
51 | Duane Gilbert | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $2,136 |
52 | Lance D Brady | Elmo, UT 84521 | $2,117 |
53 | Seth W Weber | Ferron, UT 84523 | $2,072 |
54 | Ld Jensen | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $2,023 |
55 | Tate Jensen | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $2,016 |
56 | Nielson Ranches LLC | Huntington, UT 84528 | $1,979 |
57 | Duane Kearl Jensen | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $1,971 |
58 | David Neal Hansen | Elmo, UT 84521 | $1,953 |
59 | Thomas P Guymon | Huntington, UT 84528 | $1,937 |
60 | Sharamie Darshan Feichko | Huntington, UT 84528 | $1,841 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”