Loan Deficiency in Iron County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 114
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Iron County, Utah totaled $797,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John G Pace | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $2,517 |
62 | Von Cluff | Paragonah, UT 84760 | $2,502 |
63 | Webster & Webster Livestock | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $2,347 |
64 | Wayne Smith | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $2,333 |
65 | Tony H Orton | Parowan, UT 84761 | $2,322 |
66 | Nancy Clark | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $2,217 |
67 | Charles Doug Lundgren | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $2,137 |
68 | Leon Robinson Farm Inc | Parowan, UT 84761 | $2,124 |
69 | Justin Lister | Parowan, UT 84761 | $2,028 |
70 | Lx Livestock LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $1,847 |
71 | Lorin C Jones | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $1,799 |
72 | Theon Bauer | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $1,778 |
73 | Coby Don Matheson | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $1,715 |
74 | William Trimmer | Parowan, UT 84761 | $1,697 |
75 | Edward J Gardner | Beryl, UT 84714 | $1,681 |
76 | Robert L Stratton | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $1,453 |
77 | David B Davies | St George, UT 84770 | $1,449 |
78 | Randall S Lister | Parowan, UT 84761 | $1,353 |
79 | James Orin Speirs | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $1,313 |
80 | Dale Robinson | Paragonah, UT 84760 | $1,250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”