Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Iron County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 97
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Iron County, Utah totaled $6,178,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clark Brothers | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $647,161 |
2 | Platt Livestock LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $581,347 |
3 | David G Hulet | Summit, UT 84772 | $446,318 |
4 | Scott A Stubbs | Parowan, UT 84761 | $343,713 |
5 | S & W Hall Co Inc | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $287,578 |
6 | Henry M Bulloch | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $251,230 |
7 | Howard W Jones | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $245,973 |
8 | H A Farms Inc | Parowan, UT 84761 | $245,687 |
9 | C & S Jones Livestock Lc | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $229,019 |
10 | L & B Farm & Cattle Limited Partnership | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $182,682 |
11 | Matthew Wood | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $180,934 |
12 | Bradley K Guymon | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $151,191 |
13 | Mbm Land LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $143,801 |
14 | Dean Lamoreaux | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $135,508 |
15 | Reyes Carballo | Parowan, UT 84761 | $133,431 |
16 | Walking X Livestock LLC | Beryl, UT 84714 | $129,646 |
17 | Brown Farms LLC | Beryl, UT 84714 | $125,123 |
18 | Nelson Bros Land & Livestock LLC | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $104,566 |
19 | Schoppmann Land & Livestock | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $102,731 |
20 | Harmony Land & Livestock Co | New Harmony, UT 84757 | $96,809 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>