Farm Subsidy information
Iron County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Iron County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 433
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Iron County, Utah totaled $34,590,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mbm Land LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $309,968 |
22 | Roy Adams Farms Inc | Parowan, UT 84761 | $291,247 |
23 | Brent F Hunter | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $278,991 |
24 | Laub Feeding & Cubing Inc | Beryl, UT 84714 | $271,512 |
25 | Reyes Carballo | Parowan, UT 84761 | $269,091 |
26 | Harmony Land & Livestock Co | New Harmony, UT 84757 | $268,473 |
27 | Phillip Gardner | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $253,595 |
28 | Burton Livestock | Parowan, UT 84761 | $243,746 |
29 | Robert S Clark Sheep & Cattle Company | Enoch, UT 84721 | $236,461 |
30 | Allen B Dalley | Summit, UT 84772 | $224,340 |
31 | Walking X Livestock LLC | Beryl, UT 84714 | $217,761 |
32 | Robert Holt Farms Inc | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $215,765 |
33 | Thomas Gardner | Ely, NV 89301 | $209,476 |
34 | Dick Clark Livestock LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $206,539 |
35 | Nelson Bros Land & Livestock LLC | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $199,437 |
36 | W Craig Jones | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $198,886 |
37 | Sherratt Farms | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $194,078 |
38 | Lyle C Barton | Paragonah, UT 84760 | $179,424 |
39 | J Kelly Evans | Parowan, UT 84761 | $178,297 |
40 | Mbm Livestock | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $165,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”