Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Rich County, Utah, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 62
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Rich County, Utah totaled $1,178,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hd Livestock | Randolph, UT 84064 | $6,621 |
42 | Ben Argyle | Randolph, UT 84064 | $6,060 |
43 | Eight Bar Ranch LLC | Woodruff, UT 84086 | $5,919 |
44 | Dale Lamborn | Laketown, UT 84038 | $5,892 |
45 | Hoffman's Sage Creek Ranch LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $5,742 |
46 | Kent Johnson | Laketown, UT 84038 | $5,711 |
47 | Putnam Ranch Llp | Randolph, UT 84064 | $5,583 |
48 | Necktie Ranch LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $5,027 |
49 | Tracy C Woolsey | Huntsville, UT 84317 | $4,884 |
50 | Robert M Johnson | Randolph, UT 84064 | $4,773 |
51 | Gary N Call | Randolph, UT 84064 | $4,766 |
52 | Kay Thornock & Sons | Randolph, UT 84064 | $3,895 |
53 | Stacey Ranch LLC | Woodruff, UT 84086 | $3,066 |
54 | Weston Hereford Ranch LLC | Laketown, UT 84038 | $2,751 |
55 | Dale Wilson | Randolph, UT 84064 | $2,385 |
56 | Scott N Johnson | Laketown, UT 84038 | $2,349 |
57 | Vernon Bell | Randolph, UT 84064 | $1,566 |
58 | B & H Ranching Company Inc | Laketown, UT 84038 | $1,077 |
59 | B & C Angus LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $1,065 |
60 | Dry Creek Livestock, LLC | Woodruff, UT 84086 | $1,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”