Emergency Conservation Program in San Juan County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 162
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in San Juan County, Utah totaled $562,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Joyce Fatt | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $3,428 |
62 | Lorraine Salt | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $3,254 |
63 | Shirley Ramsay | Monticello, UT 84535 | $3,242 |
64 | William David Utley | Monticello, UT 84535 | $3,101 |
65 | Henry W Holiday | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $3,099 |
66 | Lyman Farms | Blanding, UT 84511 | $2,978 |
67 | Wagon Rod Ranch | Monticello, UT 84535 | $2,972 |
68 | Emma Benally | Aneth, UT 84510 | $2,944 |
69 | Piute Springs Ranch | Monticello, UT 84535 | $2,920 |
70 | Melvin Adams Livestock Ltd | Blanding, UT 84511 | $2,892 |
71 | Lorraine Stanley | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $2,884 |
72 | Mary C Spencer | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $2,710 |
73 | Ruth Y Johnson | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $2,710 |
74 | Stella C Lee | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $2,647 |
75 | David Yanito Jr | White Mesa, UT 84511 | $2,635 |
76 | Christopher Halls | Monticello, UT 84535 | $2,560 |
77 | Paul Atcitty | Bluff, UT 84512 | $2,506 |
78 | Lorna Salt | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $2,439 |
79 | Benjamin Salt | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $2,371 |
80 | Redd Enterprises | Alamo, CA 94507 | $2,358 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”