Livestock Forage Disaster Program in San Juan County, Utah, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 135
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in San Juan County, Utah totaled $1,239,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Frances Yellow Sheppard | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,388 |
62 | Elouise Wilson | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $1,388 |
63 | Joni L Kane | Blanding, UT 84511 | $1,384 |
64 | Isaac Chamberlain | Blanding, UT 84511 | $1,339 |
65 | Nelson Beletso | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,339 |
66 | Victoria L Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,309 |
67 | Jimmy Y Whitehorse | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,282 |
68 | Mary Tso | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,260 |
69 | Leonard Lee | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,260 |
70 | Irene Pelt | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $1,230 |
71 | Hayden Lansing | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,230 |
72 | Bessie J Roberts | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,203 |
73 | Cynthia Madison | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,177 |
74 | Joyce Fatt | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,150 |
75 | Jean Marie Holgate | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $1,124 |
76 | Lynn J Begay | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,124 |
77 | Gregory Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,103 |
78 | Clara Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,094 |
79 | Edward A Begay | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,071 |
80 | Wilson Chief | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $1,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”