Livestock Forage Disaster Program in San Juan County, Utah, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 135
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in San Juan County, Utah totaled $1,299,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bessie J Roberts | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,479 |
62 | Lena Mustache | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,467 |
63 | Jean Marie Holgate | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $1,448 |
64 | Stella C Lee | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,445 |
65 | Clara Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,414 |
66 | Patsy Silas | Aneth, UT 84510 | $1,384 |
67 | Anthony Dee | Bluff, UT 84512 | $1,384 |
68 | Cynthia Madison | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,384 |
69 | Angelina Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,381 |
70 | Leonard King | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $1,350 |
71 | Edward A Begay | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,316 |
72 | Mary Rock Holiday | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $1,282 |
73 | Hayden Lansing | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,218 |
74 | Mary Tso | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $1,184 |
75 | Melvin Curley | Teec Nos Pos, AZ 86514 | $1,184 |
76 | Ruthie Betsuie | Bluff, UT 84512 | $1,184 |
77 | Rhonda Todecheene | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,150 |
78 | Patty L Bedoni | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,117 |
79 | Lucy Fatt | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $1,086 |
80 | Wilson Chief | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $1,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”