Wool and Mohair Programs in San Juan County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 241
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in San Juan County, Utah totaled $33,919 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Peter Wilson | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $115 |
102 | Emma Mitchell | Aneth, UT 84510 | $114 |
103 | Ashley Y Cly | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $113 |
104 | Charlene Valentine | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $111 |
105 | Betty C Nelson | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $110 |
106 | Willie Holiday Sr | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $109 |
107 | Albert Old | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $108 |
108 | Mary H Begay | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $107 |
109 | Louise Chief | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $107 |
110 | Harry T Mark | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $103 |
111 | Neita M Burke | Blanding, UT 84511 | $102 |
112 | Harry W Tsosie | Bluff, UT 84512 | $101 |
113 | Daisy Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $99 |
114 | Carilene R Sam | Blanding, UT 84511 | $98 |
115 | Mary Tso | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $98 |
116 | Effie Brady | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $96 |
117 | Margaret Jane Gray | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $92 |
118 | Amy J Nakai | Bluff, UT 84512 | $91 |
119 | Suzy Deal | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $91 |
120 | Eleanor Lansing | Aneth, UT 84510 | $90 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”