Wool and Mohair Programs in Sanpete County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 228
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Sanpete County, Utah totaled $1,344,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | O R Olson & Sons | Ephraim, UT 84627 | $3,679 |
62 | Francis T Black | Spring City, UT 84662 | $3,664 |
63 | Double 77 Agri Inc | Moroni, UT 84646 | $3,531 |
64 | Allen Shelley | Mount Pleasant, UT 84647 | $3,489 |
65 | Karl L Lund | Ephraim, UT 84627 | $3,384 |
66 | Thomas E Lund | Ephraim, UT 84627 | $3,384 |
67 | Nielson Sheep Co | Ephraim, UT 84627 | $3,317 |
68 | Doyce L Coates | Mount Pleasant, UT 84647 | $3,184 |
69 | K C Farms Inc | Gunnison, UT 84634 | $2,933 |
70 | Jack Stewart Anderson | Moroni, UT 84646 | $2,782 |
71 | Peel Brothers | Mt Pleasant, UT 84647 | $2,747 |
72 | Marvin R Mayers Est | Salt Lake City, UT 84102 | $2,722 |
73 | Wayne H Poulsen | Mount Pleasant, UT 84647 | $2,671 |
74 | Lee Ray Mcpherson | Mount Pleasant, UT 84647 | $2,455 |
75 | Dean N Johansen | Mount Pleasant, UT 84647 | $2,327 |
76 | Que Jensen | Fairview, UT 84629 | $2,222 |
77 | Brice Christensen | Gunnison, UT 84634 | $2,133 |
78 | Jerrold Rasmussen | Fairview, UT 84629 | $2,081 |
79 | Margaret Jensen | Fayette, UT 84630 | $2,080 |
80 | Stevan W Campbell | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $2,063 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”