Total Conservation Programs in Uintah County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 311
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Uintah County, Utah totaled $8,055,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rock Point Canal Company | Vernal, UT 84078 | $29,753 |
82 | Howard B Lee Family Ltd Ptnp | Baggs, WY 82321 | $29,717 |
83 | Danny Sessions | Jensen, UT 84035 | $29,525 |
84 | Brady Richens | Vernal, UT 84078 | $29,485 |
85 | Randy Cloward | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $29,449 |
86 | C W Mccoy Sheep Co Inc | Vernal, UT 84078 | $29,419 |
87 | Tamara C Peltier | Jensen, UT 84035 | $29,298 |
88 | Ben Murray | Vernal, UT 84078 | $28,425 |
89 | Herbert Steele | Fort Duchesne, UT 84026 | $28,305 |
90 | Richard Jenks Sr | Fort Duchesne, UT 84026 | $28,215 |
91 | Benton Ridley | Whiterocks, UT 84085 | $28,094 |
92 | Kennie R. Edrington | Jensen, UT 84035 | $27,922 |
93 | Dwain Soderquist | Vernal, UT 84078 | $27,857 |
94 | Glenn Keel | Vernal, UT 84078 | $27,639 |
95 | Richard Jenks Jr | Fort Duchesne, UT 84026 | $27,400 |
96 | Donald Curfew | Jensen, UT 84035 | $27,014 |
97 | James F Allen | Vernal, UT 84078 | $27,010 |
98 | Arlen Peterson | Jensen, UT 84035 | $26,970 |
99 | Boyd Debenham | Salt Lake City, UT 84121 | $26,706 |
100 | Mike Kendall | Layton, UT 84040 | $25,419 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”