Farm Subsidy information
Uintah County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Uintah County, Utah, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 260
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Uintah County, Utah totaled $5,520,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chivers Ranch Inc | Vernal, UT 84078 | $264,411 |
| 2 | Lazy 3x Cattle, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $261,949 |
| 3 | Chacon Sheep Co LLC | Loma, CO 81524 | $250,923 |
| 4 | Lazy 3x Sheep Company, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $219,564 |
| 5 | Bair Bros. Sheep Co. LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $212,539 |
| 6 | Hacking Land & Livestock LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $183,771 |
| 7 | Chew Livestock Inc | Jensen, UT 84035 | $179,126 |
| 8 | Nick Theos Family LLC | Meeker, CO 81641 | $156,648 |
| 9 | Clayton B Mckeachnie | Grand Junction, CO 81505 | $138,966 |
| 10 | Loren R Mckee & Sons Etrprse | Tridell, UT 84076 | $136,386 |
| 11 | Larry Lane Bankston | Tridell, UT 84076 | $127,173 |
| 12 | Indian Trail Ranch | N Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $118,987 |
| 13 | Stuntz Valley Ranch LLC | Jensen, UT 84035 | $99,982 |
| 14 | Cook Livestock LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $99,367 |
| 15 | Paul Mccoy | Vernal, UT 84078 | $90,001 |
| 16 | Holmes Bar Ne Ranch LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $87,952 |
| 17 | Morgan Batty | Vernal, UT 84078 | $79,881 |
| 18 | Nelson Farms Inc | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $79,093 |
| 19 | Smokey Rasmussen | Jensen, UT 84035 | $71,794 |
| 20 | Gary Scott Mccarrell | Vernal, UT 84078 | $70,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf