Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Uintah County, Utah, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 90
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Uintah County, Utah totaled $841,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hacking Land & Livestock LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $89,075 |
2 | Lazy 3x Cattle, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $64,127 |
3 | Chacon Sheep Co LLC | Loma, CO 81524 | $63,482 |
4 | Bair Bros. Sheep Co. LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $44,952 |
5 | Chew Livestock Inc | Jensen, UT 84035 | $44,102 |
6 | Chivers Ranch Inc | Vernal, UT 84078 | $41,235 |
7 | Lazy 3x Sheep Company, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $39,140 |
8 | , | $34,918 | |
9 | Stuntz Valley Ranch LLC | Jensen, UT 84035 | $32,067 |
10 | Cook Livestock LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $27,977 |
11 | John L Hanna | Price, UT 84501 | $26,256 |
12 | Clayton B Mckeachnie | Grand Junction, CO 81505 | $23,670 |
13 | Nick Theos Family LLC | Meeker, CO 81641 | $17,702 |
14 | Paul Mccoy | Vernal, UT 84078 | $15,906 |
15 | Smokey Rasmussen | Jensen, UT 84035 | $15,561 |
16 | Nelson Farms Inc | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $14,909 |
17 | Brad G Horrocks | Vernal, UT 84078 | $14,477 |
18 | Indian Trail Ranch | N Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $13,348 |
19 | Gary Scott Mccarrell | Vernal, UT 84078 | $12,000 |
20 | Holmes Bar Ne Ranch LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $11,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>