Loan Deficiency in Utah County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 263
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Utah County, Utah totaled $1,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ryan A Creer | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $5,887 |
62 | Robert A Millerberg | Draper, UT 84020 | $5,643 |
63 | Samuel I Stewart | Benjamin, UT 84660 | $5,570 |
64 | Dean Blackhurst | Nephi, UT 84648 | $5,550 |
65 | Norman G Olsen | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $5,446 |
66 | J Merrill Hallam | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $5,437 |
67 | Cory Cloward | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $5,381 |
68 | Donald Ludlow | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $5,122 |
69 | 3 L Farms LLC | Payson, UT 84651 | $4,934 |
70 | Lazy S&k | Lehi, UT 84043 | $4,851 |
71 | Daven Engle | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $4,807 |
72 | Blaine Evans | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $4,765 |
73 | Jeff Williams | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $4,665 |
74 | Paul Peterson | American Fork, UT 84003 | $4,525 |
75 | Aaron D Evans | Saratoga Springs, UT 84045 | $4,277 |
76 | Fred P Vincent | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $4,049 |
77 | Clarence Neil Sorensen | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $3,731 |
78 | Lynn B Banks | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $3,656 |
79 | Keith Lyman | Salem, UT 84653 | $3,506 |
80 | Wayne Penrod | Genola, UT 84655 | $3,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”