Loan Deficiency in Utah County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 263
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Utah County, Utah totaled $1,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gerald Wayne Andersen | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $2,224 |
102 | Ben E Roach | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $2,209 |
103 | Gary Larson | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $2,204 |
104 | Ronald L Carson | Cedar Valley, UT 84013 | $2,175 |
105 | Pauline U Boyer | Springville, UT 84663 | $2,143 |
106 | Gerald Thomas | Genola, UT 84655 | $2,140 |
107 | Lee R Vacher | Green River, UT 84525 | $2,127 |
108 | Howard Morgan | Goshen, UT 84633 | $2,087 |
109 | John D Youd | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $2,044 |
110 | Wallace J Cook | Cedar Valley, UT 84013 | $2,023 |
111 | Shane Palfreyman | Springville, UT 84663 | $1,991 |
112 | Russell C Stansfield | Mapleton, UT 84664 | $1,944 |
113 | Dan Throckmorton | Genola, UT 84655 | $1,930 |
114 | Lynn E Jones | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $1,917 |
115 | Wayne J Stone | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $1,834 |
116 | Frank Mecham | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $1,819 |
117 | Jay B Cornaby | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $1,798 |
118 | Ted Hansen | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $1,784 |
119 | Ronald S Jensen | Payson, UT 84651 | $1,774 |
120 | Bill Roach Family Trust | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $1,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”