Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Utah County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Utah County, Utah totaled $433,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scott Olsen Sheep | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $205,590 |
| 2 | Butler Farms, LLC | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $43,898 |
| 3 | Eldon A Neves | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $35,632 |
| 4 | Gillespie Land & Livestock | Boise, ID 83709 | $24,542 |
| 5 | Irene Lamont | South Jordan, UT 84095 | $19,569 |
| 6 | Alan G Swenson | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $17,234 |
| 7 | Lyman Livestock LLC | Salem, UT 84653 | $12,588 |
| 8 | Andrew V Neves | Mapleton, UT 84664 | $11,054 |
| 9 | Cedar Valley Farms LLC | Cedar Valley, UT 84013 | $10,937 |
| 10 | Neil Lundell | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $9,395 |
| 11 | Ervil Z Ewell | Genola, UT 84655 | $8,880 |
| 12 | Jan Corless | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $8,119 |
| 13 | Rt Wilson Cattle Co. | Payson, UT 84651 | $6,144 |
| 14 | Chad Coburn | Genola, UT 84655 | $4,310 |
| 15 | Marlin Hall | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $3,685 |
| 16 | Millard N Balzly | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $3,072 |
| 17 | Jim Caras | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $2,762 |
| 18 | Cameron James Smith | Cedar Valley, UT 84013 | $2,626 |
| 19 | Osborn Services, Inc | Genola, UT 84655 | $2,446 |
| 20 | Ryan Curtis Stansfield | Salem, UT 84653 | $613 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
