Farm Subsidy information
Utah County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Utah County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,193
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Utah County, Utah totaled $85,912,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alan Riley Properties LLC | Payson, UT 84651 | $377,870 |
42 | Stanley G Lewis | Lehi, UT 84043 | $368,189 |
43 | Dan E Vacher | Salem, UT 84653 | $363,345 |
44 | Tony And Tina Guerras Farm | Santaquin, UT 84655 | $340,410 |
45 | Penrod Farms | Genola, UT 84655 | $332,868 |
46 | Grant Smith Farms LLC | Cedar Valley, UT 84013 | $320,009 |
47 | Rowley's South Ridge Farm | Santaquin, UT 84655 | $310,787 |
48 | Lynn Ray Hales | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $307,336 |
49 | Clair O Anderson Farms | Benjamin, UT 84660 | $306,472 |
50 | Brent E Money | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $297,207 |
51 | Mckinney Farms | American Fork, UT 84003 | $297,102 |
52 | Jay R Peterson | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $293,299 |
53 | Ferguson Fruit Orch | Santaquin, UT 84655 | $283,134 |
54 | Bruce Hall | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $281,644 |
55 | Beehive Condominiums LLC | Alpine, UT 84004 | $279,440 |
56 | Scott Olsen Sheep | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $276,953 |
57 | Keith A Williams | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $274,090 |
58 | Zd Cattle Company | Cedar Fort, UT 84013 | $272,979 |
59 | Valley View Orch Inc | Santaquin, UT 84655 | $271,984 |
60 | Rowley's Fruit Farm, Inc | Payson, UT 84651 | $270,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”