Farm Subsidy information
Wasatch County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Wasatch County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 269
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wasatch County, Utah totaled $8,153,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cedar View Dairy LLC | Heber City, UT 84032 | $816,382 |
2 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $778,355 |
3 | E Ray Okelberry Joint Venture | Fountain Green, UT 84632 | $504,144 |
4 | Scott Olsen Sheep | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $324,677 |
5 | Eph Jensen Livestock LLC | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $268,721 |
6 | Allen H Sweat | Heber City, UT 84032 | $225,366 |
7 | Bitner Creek LLC | Holladay, UT 84117 | $210,744 |
8 | George P Holmes | Heber City, UT 84032 | $204,055 |
9 | Brb Livestock Co | Sandy, UT 84070 | $188,811 |
10 | Canyon View Farms LLC | Midway, UT 84049 | $187,494 |
11 | Mac Jessen | Altamont, UT 84001 | $177,488 |
12 | Red Pine Ranches, Inc. | Oakley, UT 84055 | $167,915 |
13 | Mountain Canyon Livestock | Heber, UT 84032 | $147,632 |
14 | Stephanie Christensen | Altamont, UT 84001 | $145,837 |
15 | C&c Land And Livestock LLC | Vernal, UT 84079 | $142,342 |
16 | Gregory Mckee | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $141,998 |
17 | Remund Dairy Inc % Roy Remund | Midway, UT 84049 | $128,813 |
18 | Dc Land & Livestock Lc | Kamas, UT 84036 | $123,927 |
19 | Thomas Laren Provost | Heber City, UT 84032 | $115,574 |
20 | Lamar Christensen | Heber City, UT 84032 | $96,154 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>