Farm Subsidy information
Wasatch County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Wasatch County, Utah, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 50
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wasatch County, Utah totaled $1,222,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $289,361 |
| 2 | Cedar View Dairy LLC | Heber City, UT 84032 | $169,270 |
| 3 | Eph Jensen Livestock LLC | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $73,630 |
| 4 | Bitner Creek LLC | Holladay, UT 84117 | $64,203 |
| 5 | Stephanie Christensen | Altamont, UT 84001 | $52,649 |
| 6 | Mac Jessen | Altamont, UT 84001 | $50,435 |
| 7 | Canyon View Farms LLC | Midway, UT 84049 | $46,319 |
| 8 | Scott Olsen Sheep | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $36,087 |
| 9 | Dc Land & Livestock Lc | Kamas, UT 84036 | $28,580 |
| 10 | C&c Land And Livestock LLC | Vernal, UT 84079 | $27,064 |
| 11 | Gregory Mckee | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $26,992 |
| 12 | Allen H Sweat | Heber City, UT 84032 | $20,642 |
| 13 | Dalas W. Jones | Tabiona, UT 84072 | $20,116 |
| 14 | Osborn Services, Inc | Genola, UT 84655 | $18,412 |
| 15 | Tri-wilson Ranch LLC | Salem, UT 84653 | $16,649 |
| 16 | Ed Clyde | Heber City, UT 84032 | $16,254 |
| 17 | Round Valley Honey, LLC | Wallsburg, UT 84082 | $11,855 |
| 18 | Nicholas Provost | Heber City, UT 84032 | $10,913 |
| 19 | Chase Potter | Tabiona, UT 84072 | $10,705 |
| 20 | Brb Livestock Co | Sandy, UT 84070 | $10,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf