Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Washington County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 83
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Washington County, Utah totaled $1,390,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $19,389 | |
22 | Foremaster Ranches Lc | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $18,800 |
23 | Thomas Gubler Properties LLC | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $18,714 |
24 | Dennis Frei | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $17,452 |
25 | S O Bundy Ranch Lc | St George, UT 84790 | $16,880 |
26 | Derick C Blake | St George, UT 84790 | $16,717 |
27 | Kelly Blake | Saint George, UT 84790 | $15,434 |
28 | D & R Ranch Inc | St George, UT 84770 | $14,993 |
29 | Adams Livestock Enterprises Inc | Saint George, UT 84790 | $14,566 |
30 | Grassy Flat Land & Livestock | Central, UT 84722 | $14,114 |
31 | Phillip Gardner | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $12,879 |
32 | Burgess Ranch LLC | Saint George, UT 84770 | $12,264 |
33 | Devin Ruesch | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $12,234 |
34 | Jimmie B Hughes | Saint George, UT 84790 | $12,100 |
35 | Kelby Iverson | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $11,968 |
36 | Demar Lc | St George, UT 84770 | $11,887 |
37 | Colette Wadsworth | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $11,548 |
38 | Curtis L Graff | Washington, UT 84780 | $11,281 |
39 | Gates Family Ranch Holdings, LLC | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $10,098 |
40 | Reeve Ranch LLC | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $9,870 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”