Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Washington County, Utah, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 68
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Washington County, Utah totaled $851,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $12,278 | |
22 | Layton Cattle Company LLC | Littlefield, AZ 86432 | $12,278 |
23 | Thomas Gubler Properties LLC | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $12,137 |
24 | S O Bundy Ranch Lc | St George, UT 84790 | $11,014 |
25 | Phillip Gardner | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $10,733 |
26 | Derick C Blake | St George, UT 84790 | $10,523 |
27 | Kelly Blake | Saint George, UT 84790 | $10,490 |
28 | Grassy Flat Land & Livestock | Central, UT 84722 | $10,343 |
29 | D & R Ranch Inc | St George, UT 84770 | $10,084 |
30 | Jeff Esplin | Saint George, UT 84790 | $9,821 |
31 | Adams Livestock Enterprises Inc | Saint George, UT 84790 | $9,488 |
32 | Colette Wadsworth | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $8,399 |
33 | Burgess Ranch LLC | Saint George, UT 84770 | $8,317 |
34 | Kelby Iverson | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $8,044 |
35 | Devin Ruesch | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $7,890 |
36 | Demar Lc | St George, UT 84770 | $7,549 |
37 | Jed Christian Nelson | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $7,436 |
38 | Curtis L Graff | Washington, UT 84780 | $7,265 |
39 | Jimmie B Hughes | Saint George, UT 84790 | $6,734 |
40 | Sam Larson | St George, UT 84790 | $6,525 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”