Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Utah, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 104
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Utah totaled $3,516,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Brock Andrus | Washington, UT 84780 | $7,461 |
62 | Charles Franklin Hulet | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $7,308 |
63 | C F Hulet Ranch & Livestock LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $7,239 |
64 | Larry Mack Adams | Washington, UT 84780 | $6,802 |
65 | Stacey O Hughes | Saint George, UT 84770 | $6,601 |
66 | Nielson Cattle Co | Leeds, UT 84746 | $6,258 |
67 | Steve Layton | Littlefield, AZ 86432 | $5,690 |
68 | Richard F Wright | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $5,252 |
69 | Hilton Covington | Brookside, UT 84782 | $5,219 |
70 | John W Slack | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $4,610 |
71 | Ronald Reeve | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $4,521 |
72 | Zackary W Frei | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $4,510 |
73 | E Lazy J Ranch LLC | Veyo, UT 84782 | $4,145 |
74 | D & D Consolidated LLC | St George, UT 84770 | $4,124 |
75 | Walking X Livestock LLC | Beryl, UT 84714 | $4,078 |
76 | Clark Ence | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $3,350 |
77 | Norman Howard | Washington, UT 84780 | $3,317 |
78 | James G Barr III | Ivins, UT 84738 | $2,708 |
79 | Tyler Trek Gubler | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $2,702 |
80 | D & B Prince Ranch LLC | New Harmony, UT 84757 | $2,604 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”